上古藝術

藝術是一種探索和表達的方式，它帶給人們無盡的想像空間和情感共鳴。從上古藝術的神秘符號到現代藝術的抽象表現，藝術家們用不同的形式和媒介傳達他們的創意和思想。每一件藝術品都是一個獨特而令人驚嘆的世界，觀眾可以在其中感受到藝術家的情感和見解。

上古藝術是人類文明的起源，它們記載了古代人們的生活和信仰。這些古老的藝術品在現代看來仍然具有極大的價值和意義，它們不僅是藝術史的寶貴遺產，也激發了當代藝術家的創作靈感。

藝術是一個無窮的藝術世界，每一種風格和流派都有其獨特的魅力和韻味。通過欣賞和理解不同類型的藝術作品，我們可以感受到藝術帶來的無限樂趣和啟發。不論是古老的上古藝術還是當代的現代藝術，藝術作品都承載著藝術家的心靈和思想，讓我們享受到了藝術的魅力。

上古藝術

By Zhang Xiaoyi, Wang Zhaobin and Xie Dongming, Journalists of CNEWS, Taipei

Mr. W applied for the DBS Bank Flying World Card in Taipei in 2019, and it was issued on August 5 of the same year. However, on November 16, 2023, Mr. W’s credit card was abruptly canceled without any prior notice, resulting in the loss of 472,414 accumulated flight points. In response, Lin Yuhui, a strategic director at Bo Heng Law Firm specializing in commercial litigation and financial disputes, suggests that cardholders can file a complaint with the Financial Ombudsman Institution. They can also claim for damages on the grounds of the financial institution’s breach of contract or tort.

Mr. W stated that he had always paid the annual fee on time and cleared the card balance every month during the use of the credit card. He could not understand why DBS Bank canceled his card. Despite multiple inquiries to DBS Bank, he received no reasonable explanation, nor did the bank disclose his total spending amount.

Lin Yuhui explained that according to the Financial Consumer Protection Act, if a cardholder disputes the card cancellation, which constitutes the termination of the credit card contract, it is considered a financial consumer dispute under the Act. Consumers can opt for the procedures stipulated by this law.

According to Article 13 of the Financial Consumer Protection Act, financial consumers must first file a complaint with the financial service provider for financial consumer disputes. The provider must appropriately handle the complaint within 30 days from the date of receipt and notify the financial consumer of the result.

If the financial consumer is dissatisfied with the result or if the provider fails to handle the complaint within the 30-day period, the consumer can apply for mediation with the dispute resolution institution within 60 days of receiving the result or the expiration of the period. If a complaint is filed with the Financial Ombudsman Institution, it will be forwarded to the financial service provider for handling.

Lin Yuhui noted that for disputes over financial consumer complaints, mediation applications can be made according to Articles 29 and 30 of the Financial Consumer Protection Act. The Ombudsman Institution must produce a mediation report and deliver it to the parties. The parties must notify the institution in writing within the deadline specified in the report, indicating whether they accept or reject the mediation decision. Once both parties accept the mediation result, the financial consumer can apply to the court for confirmation of the mediation report within 90 days, after which it has the same effect as a final civil judgment.

Lin Yuhui pointed out that if consumers do not file a complaint with the Ombudsman Institution and suffer damage due to the financial institution’s non-compliance with the standardized credit card contract, they can claim damages for breach of contract or tort by providing relevant proof of the damages suffered.

Lin Yuhui emphasized that the Financial Supervisory Commission has already announced the standardized credit card contract according to Article 17 of the Consumer Protection Act. Therefore, if the financial institution’s standardized contract violates the announced standard contract, the terms of the standardized contract are invalid. Additionally, according to Article 56-1 of the same law, the violating financial institution may face administrative fines.

Moreover, financial institutions must ensure the truthfulness of their advertisements, promotions, and marketing activities and must not engage in deceptive, fraudulent, or misleading practices. If any violation causes damage to financial consumers, the institution is liable for compensation under Article 11 of the Financial Consumer Protection Act.

Furthermore, lawyer Zhang Kexi from Xin Xin Law Firm stated that credit card contracts are standardized. Unless otherwise specified in the contract, banks have no reason to cancel a card at will. He noted that if cardholders have paid the annual fee and cleared the monthly balance, the bank should explain the specific clause and reason for the cancellation. Otherwise, it violates the credit card contract agreement between the two parties.

A senior credit card department staff member explained that common reasons for card cancellation include unpaid card balances, overdue payments on related loans such as mortgages and car loans, and serious issues like abnormal personal credit, such as bounced checks. Disputes with the bank can also lead to reevaluation of the cardholder’s creditworthiness and potential card cancellation. However, unless there are credit abnormalities, forced card cancellation is typically an individual bank’s measure and does not affect the cardholder’s dealings with other banks.

Photo Source: CNEWS File photo

《More CNEWS reports》

Exclusive／8-1【With Video】Bank Canceled Card Without Reason, Nullifies 470,000 Air Miles; Consumer Complains DBS is the Worst Bank in Taiwan

8-8／DBS Bank Faces Backlash After Zeroing Out 470,000 Reward Points; Consumers Speak Out

【In case of article forwarding, please cite the source】